To support implementation of the systemic safety management approach to highway safety,įHWA published the Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool (Preston et al., 2013) guidanceĭocument to outline the systemic safety process and to support agency implementation of theĪpproach. (Lefler et al., 2017) and the MMUCC GuidelineâModel Minimum Uniform Crash Criteriaâģ.1 Application of the FHWA Systemic Safety Project ![]() Using terminology consistent with the Model Inventory of Roadway ElementsâMIRE 2.0 ![]() While describing the variousĪpplications of the systemic safety management approaches, data requirements are described ¢ Application of the usRAP methodology, using the associated ViDA software.Įach of the three approaches is described in more detail below. ¢ Application of SPFs, using in-house tools or Safety Analyst. ¢ Application of the FHWA Systemic Tool methodology, customized to local data availability This section describes three primaryĪpproaches that agencies have used to implement systemic safety management: Differences in crash data availability, roadwayĬharacteristic inventory availability, and scope of the systemic safety program may affect howĪn agency applies a systemic safety management approach. The general purpose and methodology for performing a systemic safety management analysisĪre explained in part 2.3 in Section 2, but agencies use a variety of implementation approachesįor their systemic safety management programs. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages. Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |